When you sit down to work on the literature review of your thesis, it requires to include a vast line of relevant literature from the prior work done in the similar area. Id it only important to check the relevance of research paper with your thesis theme or you also need to check its credibility? Often the parameters for checking credibility are high quality research design and reputation. To assess the reputation, the authors checks that the chosen paper on these three aspects:
This kind of evaluation appears to be quite a straightforward measure for evaluating the credibility of the document. Even a novice researcher would have good sense to identify which journals are of repute in specific fields and the higher the number of citations for a research paper, the better it is.
These parameters are often used by researchers, more so when they are in a rush to submit a manuscript as these are simple techniques/parameters as compared to other features such as sample size, controls, logic and the other detailed aspects of the study design. Still there are some flaws in this method:
As a researcher, when designing a literature review you may find the task of assessing credibility as very herculean. Though getting certainty about the validity may be very challenging, stay away from misconceptions so your confidence level stays high by ensuring that the content is relevant to your document.